Discuss other readings you have consulted on the debate, whether additional readings from Sahlins and Obeyesekere, or commentaries form other authors.
The essay is about the debate on James Cook death between Sahlins and Obeyesekere. Use the uploaded sources Firstly, Sahlins made his argument in the paper Captain James Cook: Or, The Dying God (see the document Sahlins 1 sent before for week 4). Secondly, Obeyesekere made his counterargument to Sahlins in the paper The Apotheosis of Captain Cook (see the document Obeyesekere 1 sent before for week 4). Thirdly, Sahlins made his rebuttal to Obeyesekere in the paper How Natives Think (see the document Week 5-Sahlins 2 sent before for week 5). Finally, Borofsky gave the summary of their debate in the paper Cook, Lono, Obeyesekere, and Sahlins (see the document Week 5-Borofsky sent before for week 5). These four papers are essential to understand the debate. This is the structure of the essay: 1. Give a summary of the debate (approximately 10%); 2. Discuss other readings you have consulted on the debate, whether additional readings from Sahlins and Obeyesekere, or commentaries form other authors. (see other documents sent before for week 5) (approximately 20%-30%); 3. Offer your own analytical evaluation of the debate. Here is where you give us your own thoughts (approximately 50%): Does anyone win the debate? What issues does the debate clarify? What issues does it seem to Ignore or confuse? Are there questions for further research that you would like to pose? 4. Then offer a conclusion (approximately 10%-20%)Tags: consulted, debate, discuss, other, readings, whether